THE ROLE OF OPINION LEADERS IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS: A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS STUDY ON STARLINK CONTENT ON YOUTUBE

Authors

  • First Peter Jordan Refael Kenap Faculty of Communication, Gunadarma University
  • Sendi Eka Nanda Faculty of Communication, Gunadarma University
  • Lenie Okviana Faculty of Communication, Gunadarma University
  • Budi Santoso Faculty of Communication, Gunadarma University

Keywords:

Opinion leader digital, Social network analysis, Actor level, System level, Starlink.

Abstract

This research aims to identify the key actors involved in Starlink-related content shared by the @NanangMrk YouTube channel and examine their roles, numbers, and impacts within the communication network. The study employs an exploratory quantitative approach, utilizing Social Network Analysis (SNA) with Gephi 0.10.1 software. The research analyzed 2,721 comments from Starlink content posted by @NanangMrk between May 19-20, 2024, and sampled 2,128 actors or nodes using netlytic.org (communalytic.org) data collection techniques. This study was guided by the innovation diffusion theories. Findings reveal that the communication network's most influential actors connecting with others are @NanangMrk, @agps4418, @dedy6885, @MAKI-db9it, and @Mojojoba. Closeness centrality values indicate that 51 actors have strong connections with others, whereas betweenness centrality analysis demonstrates that @NanangMrk functions as a key communication link between clusters. As a significant opinion leader, @NanangMrk has extensive connections within the network, rendering these actors the most reliable sources of information or opinion leaders for promoting the Starlink product. The network is substantial, but the communication intensity is relatively low, decentralized, and predominantly unidirectional, with a small system diameter and radius. Consequently, it was concluded that utilizing YouTube's social media platform effectively disseminates information and reaches a broader audience regarding Starlink. Future research should incorporate group-level analyses with diverse themes.

References

Book:

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks. Sage Publications. Kasiram, Mohammad. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif-Kualitatif. 12 Edition. Malang: UIN

Malang Press

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

Journal or Magazine:

Abidin, C. (2018). Digital opinion leaders and social media influencers. Journal of Digital Culture, 10(4), 121-133.

Almeida, J., Momtaz, H., & Navarro, L. (2011). Social Network Analysis (SNA) in digital communication. Journal of Network Studies, 13(5), 245-261.

Ardiyanti, N., Putra, A. F., & Widyantara, Y. (2022). Jaringan aktivisme digital dalam gerakan sosial #FreeWestPapua. Social Movement Review, 17(3), 88-105.

Berger, J. (2016). How social media shapes public opinion. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 15(3), 283- 295.

Bodendorf, F., & Kaiser, C. (2009). Digital marketing and opinion leadership. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(6), 455-467.

Candra, J., & Oktavianti, R. (2019). Opini publik tentang teknologi inovatif: Kasus Starlink. Journal of Public Opinion Studies, 7(2), 97-111.

Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers and brand loyalty on Instagram and YouTube. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1067-1081.

Einstein, E., Tulungen, W., & Evans, W. (2022). Kepemimpinan digital dalam pengambilan keputusan.

Leadership Studies Journal, 18(1), 45-56.

Guldbrandsson, K., Sjöström, M., & Lindholm, A. (2012). Health Promotion in Social Networks.

Journal of Public Health Communication, 20(2), 119-133.

Kinanggi, S. K., Kusumadewi, N. S., & Kusuma, D. (2022). Leadership Communication during COVID-19 Crisis. International Journal of Religious Communication, 10(2), 56-68.

Meutia. (2021). YouTube sebagai Platform Distribusi Konten Video di Era Transformasi Digital.

Journal of Communication Studies, 14(2), 123-135.

Momtaz, H. A., et al. (2011). Network Structures in Digital Communication

Prabawati, A., & Premananto, G. (2023). Transformasi Digital dan Pengambilan Keputusan Strategis di Industri Medial. Journal of Strategic Media Management, 22(3), 67-79.

Rahman, R. (2023). Role of Digital Opinion Leaders in Technological Discourse. Journal of Digital Communication, 15(4), 89-101.

Rinaldo, F., & Eriyanto. (2023). Aktivisme digital dan gerakan tagar politik: Studi kasus Twitter.

Journal of Political Activism, 8(4), 90-105.

Surya, I., Prawira, F., & Yudhistira, D. (2021). Pengaruh literasi digital terhadap penyebaran kebijakan politik di media sosial. Journal of Political Media, 23(1), 12-29.

Wardani, P. K., & Akbar, A. Z. (2020). Peran komunikasi dalam kepemimpinan modern. Leadership and Communication Journal, 19(2), 110-123.

Wibisono, H. (2023). Analisis jejaring sosial digital dalam diskusi kewirausahaan di Twitter. Journal of Digital Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 25-33.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

Kenap, F. P. J. R., Sendi Eka Nanda, Lenie Okviana, & Budi Santoso. (2025). THE ROLE OF OPINION LEADERS IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS: A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS STUDY ON STARLINK CONTENT ON YOUTUBE. Indonesia Broadcasting Conference (IBC), 1, 551–565. Retrieved from https://apik-ptma.org/publication/index.php/IndonesiaBroadcastingConference/article/view/418