THE MEANING OF SYMBOLIC INTERACTION IN THE PROCESS OF PIKAMBOLAKUA CEREMONY
Abstract
Purpose of this research is to examine “The Meaning of Symbolic Interaction in the Process of Pikambolakua Ceremony of Buton Tribe, Lapandewa Kaindea Village, Lapandewa Subdistrict”. Researching the meaning of symbolic interaction in the Pikambolakua ceremony because it can be used as a step to find out the meaning and purpose in the implementation of the traditional ceremony. This type of research is qualitative research based on inductive thinking patterns, which are based on participatory objective observation of a symptom (phenomenon). Understanding phenomena from the context of participants, social, and institutions is the main goal of qualitative research, which also aims to simplify the findings to explain the problem. the main results of the research on the Pikambolakua ceremony in Lapandewa Village, which involved direct observation and interviews with the local community, will be presented. The findings show that the ceremony consists of several important stages, from preparation, ritual execution, to closing. Each stage has specific meanings and functions that contribute to the community's understanding of their relationship with the spiritual and social worlds.This research has examined the meaning of symbolic interaction in the Pikambolakua ceremony process in the Lapandewa Kaindea Village community. Through various symbols, such as traditional clothing, ritual objects, and symbolic actions, the ceremony has not only become a tradition, but also serves as a mechanism for transmitting the values of the community.References
Ahmad, and Muslimah. 2021. “Memahami Teknik Pengolahan Dan Analisis Data Kualitatif.” Proceedings 1(1):173–86.
Ahmadi, Dadi. 2018 “Interaksi Simbolik: Suatu Pengantar”. Jurnal Komunikasi, Vol. 9, No. 2. Bachtiar, Wardi. Sosiologi Klasik dari Comte Hingga Parsons. Bandung: PT Remaja
Astuti, Hani, and Anggie Putri Marvelia. 2019. “Makna Simbol Ritual Siraman Pernikahan Adat Jawa Tengah (Analisis Interaksional Simbolik Pada Ritual Siraman Pernikahan Adat Jawa Tengah).” Komunikologi 16(1):38.
Creswell, John W. 2015. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Elbadiansyah, Umiarso. Interaksionisme Simbolik Dari Era Klasik Hingga Modern. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2014.
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. Antropologi Sosial Dan Budaya Sebuah Pengantar. Maumere: Ledalero, 2019.
Faris, Salman. 2014. “Islam Dan Budaya Lokal (Studi Atas Tradisi Keislaman Masyarakat Jawa).” Thaqafiyyat 15(1):75–89.
Giamouzi, M. 2008. “City , University of London Institutional Repository.” 34(2019):51–79. doi: 10.6092/issn.1971-8853/18664.
Haritz Asmi Zanki. 2020. “Teori Psikologi Dan Sosial Pendidikan (Teori Interaksi Simbolik).” Scolae: Journal of Pedagogy Vol. 3(No. 2):h. 118.
Irianto, Agus Maladi. 2020.“Interaksionisme Simbolik, Pendekatan Antropologis Merespons Fenomena Keseharian. Semarang: Gigih Pustaka Mandiri.
Indriani, R. 2016. “Makna Interaksi Simbolik Dalam Proses Upacara Pernikahan Suku Buton Lapandewa Kaindea.” E-Journal Ilmu Komunikasi 4(3):207–21.
Lestarina, Dian Ayu. 2018. “Nilai Budaya dalam Leksikon Tuturan Tradisi Pernikahan Komunitas Sedulur Sikep di Kabupaten Kudus (Sebuah Kajian Antropolinguistik).” Skripsi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
L. Rudy Rustandi. 2022. “Media Sosial Facebook Sebagai Sarana Berbagi Informasi (Information Sharing) Keagamaan Dan Dinamika Sosial Masyarakat Di Indonesia.” Jurnal SUARGA: Studi Keberagamaan Dan Keberagaman 1(2):01–30. doi: 10.24090/suarga.v1i2.7079.
Luthfie, Muhammad, Aida Viyala, S. Hubeis, Amiruddin Saleh, and Basita Ginting. 2017. “Muhammad Luthfie, Dkk, Interaksi Simbolik Organisasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Desa.” Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi 1:19–34.
Mulyadi, A. M. Seto dkk. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Mixed Method: Perspektif yang Terbaru untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Kemanusiaan dan Budaya. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Manafe, Yermia Djefri. 2018. “Komunikasi Ritual Pada Budaya Bertani Atoni Pah Meto Di Timor-Nusa Tenggara Timur.” Jurnal ASPIKOM 1(3):287. doi: 10.24329/aspikom.v1i3.26.
Najoan, Angelina Natalia, Max R. Rembang, and Herry Mulyono. 2017. “Makna Pesan Komunikasi Tradisional Tarian Maengket.” Acta Diurna Komunikasi 6(1):1–15.
Nuzuli, Ahmad Khairul. 2023. “Faktor Penghambat Dan Pendukung Komunikasi Antara Guru Dan Siswa Tuna Rungu Di SLBN Kota Sungai Penuh.” Jurnal Komunikasi 14(1):49–58. doi: 10.31294/jkom.v14i1.14505.
Oloidi, Akintunde John. 2020. “Theory of Symbolic Interactionism in Heritage Tourism: Assumptions, Criticisms and Applications.” Journal of Tourism and Heritage Studies 9(2):41–58.
Rijali, Ahmad. 2018. “Analisis Data Kualitatif Ahmad Rijali UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.” 17(33):81–95.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
